forWeston Funding
Meta Ads Report · Last 30 days

30 leads at $77 each.

Over Jun 23 - Jul 22, 2026, Meta delivered 30 leads at a blended $77. NZ 01 - Website Leads - Austin carried it at $31 per lead.

30
Leads
Meta lead forms
$77
Blended cost / lead
Lead campaigns
$2,631
Meta spend
Last 30 days
$31
Best segment
Lowest CPL
Leads are Meta lead-form submissions. Blended cost per lead covers the lead campaigns; awareness spend is shown separately and excluded.
The story

The window in three moves.

We lead with the result, then show how the campaigns and creative produced it.

01
$31

Austin is the template

Austin delivered the cheapest lead at $31, on the same creative that drove most of the volume. That is the proven base we rebuild the funnel on.

02
Paused

Quality is the focus, not cost

Delivery is paused on purpose while we tighten lead quality. The leads were inexpensive; the gap was how many were ready to close, so that is what we fix next.

03
45+

Who we target next

73% of leads are 45 and over and 90% are men, concentrated in Texas. That profile guides both the audience and the qualification step ahead.

Meta Ads

Where the leads came from.

Daily volume and cost, then the campaign and creative behind it. Awareness spend is tracked separately and excluded from cost per lead.

Leads & spend per day

Leads Daily spend
Window total 30 leadsShaded band = latest 7 days
CampaignSpendLeadsCost / leadCTRCPC
NZ 01 - Website Leads - Houston
$7987$1143.1%$3.58
NZ 01 - Website Leads - DFW
$6423$2142.7%$3.65
NZ 01 - Website Leads - Austin Best CPL
$50316$312.5%$3.27
NZ 01 - Website Leads - San Antonio
$3774$942.7%$2.73
NZ 01 - IG Profile Visits Engagement$3100n/a3.2%$0.46
Blended lead total$2,32130$77--

Top-performing creative

Who the leads come from

Leads by age & gender

Where the leads concentrate. Lead campaigns only.

MenWomen
18-24125-34235-44545-54455-64465+14

Leads by placement

Bar length is leads; the label shows cost per lead. Lead campaigns only.

Facebook feed16 · $84 CPLInstagram Reels11 · $33 CPLFacebook Stories2 · $50 CPLInstagram Stories1 · $106 CPL
i
Who the leads are coming from. Of the 30 leads with a demographic on file, 27 (90%) came from men and 22 (73%) from the 45-and-over brackets. Measured on the lead campaigns only; the individual age and gender cells are small, so read this as where demand concentrates, not a targeting verdict.
Placement points to the efficient mix. Instagram Reels delivered the cheapest lead at $33 (11 leads), while Facebook feed drove the most volume. The rebuild weights toward the placements that produce qualified leads. Measured on the lead campaigns only.
What's next

Where we take it from here.

Each move ties back to what this window proved.

Primary move

Rebuild for lead quality, not more volume.

Volume and cost per lead are already strong. The next gain is quality, so we retool the funnel to send Weston fewer, better-qualified leads before turning delivery back on.

What we do
Add a qualification step before leads reach your team.
Evidence
Leads are cheap ($31 best), but too few are ready to close.
Risk
Fewer raw leads, in exchange for higher intent.
We need
Your disqualifiers and FICO thresholds to build the step.
Operating plan

The next window.

  • Multi-step qualification form: capture the lead, then a second step that filters for real intent before it reaches sales.
  • Reset the pixel so optimization stops learning from low-quality signal.
  • Optimize toward the qualification step, not the first form fill.
  • Automate follow-up for step-one leads so your team spends time only on the qualified ones.
The next chapter

Now we raise the quality.

The cost side works. Next we rebuild the funnel so more of every lead is worth your team's time, then turn delivery back on. We will bring you a fresh read each window.

Talk through the plan