forWeston Funding
Meta Ads Report · Last 30 days

30 leads at $77 each.

Over Jun 23 - Jul 22, 2026, Meta delivered 30 leads at a blended $77. NZ 01 - Website Leads - Austin carried it at $31 per lead.

30
Leads
Meta lead forms
$77
Blended cost / lead
Lead campaigns
$2,631
Meta spend
Last 30 days
$31
Best segment
Lowest CPL
Leads are Meta lead-form submissions. Blended cost per lead covers the lead campaigns; awareness spend is shown separately and excluded.
The story

The window in three moves.

We lead with the result, then show how the campaigns and creative produced it.

01
$31

NZ 01 - Website Leads - Au is the engine

Lowest cost per lead at $31. Same creative, best economics, so budget stays weighted here.

02
16

One creative carries

"6/11 - [Page Post] Video - We fu" drove 16 leads at about $30 each. The message that is landing.

03
4

Diversified sources

4 lead campaigns contributed, so results do not rely on a single audience.

Meta Ads

Where the leads came from.

Daily volume and cost, then the campaign and creative behind it. Awareness spend is tracked separately and excluded from cost per lead.

Leads & spend per day

Leads Daily spend
Window total 30 leadsShaded band = latest 7 days
CampaignSpendLeadsCost / leadCTRCPC
NZ 01 - Website Leads - Houston
$7987$1143.1%$3.58
NZ 01 - Website Leads - DFW
$6423$2142.7%$3.65
NZ 01 - Website Leads - Austin Best CPL
$50316$312.5%$3.27
NZ 01 - Website Leads - San Antonio
$3774$942.7%$2.73
NZ 01 - IG Profile Visits Engagement$3100n/a3.2%$0.46
Blended lead total$2,32130$77--

Top-performing creative

Who the leads come from

Leads by age & gender

Where the leads concentrate. Lead campaigns only.

MenWomen
18-24125-34235-44545-54455-64465+14

Leads by placement

Bar length is leads; the label shows cost per lead. Lead campaigns only.

Facebook feed16 · $84 CPLInstagram Reels11 · $33 CPLFacebook Stories2 · $50 CPLInstagram Stories1 · $106 CPLInstagram feed0 · $413 spent
i
Who the leads are coming from. Of the 30 leads with a demographic on file, 27 (90%) came from men and 22 (73%) from the 45-and-over brackets. Measured on the lead campaigns only; the individual age and gender cells are small, so read this as where demand concentrates, not a targeting verdict.
Placement is sorting the spend. Instagram Reels delivered the cheapest lead at $33 (11 on $359); Instagram feed spent $413 with no lead attributed, a candidate to switch off. Measured on the lead campaigns only.
What's next

Where we take it from here.

Each move ties back to what this window proved.

Primary move

Scale the winners, fix what is expensive.

We weight budget toward the lowest cost per lead and the winning creative while holding the expensive segments to prove their CPL can come down.

What we do
Step up the best audience and creative.
Evidence
$31 on the best segment.
Risk
CPL can drift as we scale; we cap increments.
We need
Your read on lead quality by segment.
Operating plan

The next window.

  • Build variations of the winning creative so results do not lean on one asset.
  • Refresh retargeting before frequency wears the warm audience out.
  • Cut or fix the segments running above target CPL.
  • Review lead quality together so we optimize toward closed deals, not just form fills.
The next chapter

Now we scale it.

We push the proven audiences and creative, fix what is expensive, and bring you a fresh read each window. Tell us how the leads land in your pipeline.

Talk through the plan