forHartley Law
Meta Ads Report · Last 30 days

2,106 responses at $2.32 each.

Over Sep 12 - Oct 11, 2026, Meta delivered 2,106 responses at a blended $2.32. AC 01 - Website Leads - August… carried it at $0.92 per response.

2,106
Responses
up 5,592% vs prior 30 days
$2.32
Cost per response
down 98% vs prior 30 days
$4,891
Meta spend
down 1% vs prior 30 days
$0.92
Best campaign
Lowest cost per response
Response* = someone who filled in a form or tapped the call button after clicking an ad. *Meta counts these actions in a single group, so this figure is them combined. We are separating them for the next report. Cost per response covers the lead campaigns; awareness spend is shown separately and excluded.
The story

The window in three moves.

We lead with the result, then show how the campaigns and creative produced it.

01
$0.92

AC 01 - Website Leads - August… is the engine

Lowest cost per response at $0.92. Same creative, best economics, so budget stays weighted here.

02
2,013

One creative carries

"09/09 - Video - Whos At Fault" drove 2,013 responses at about $0.92 each. The message that is landing.

03
2

Diversified sources

2 lead campaigns contributed, so results do not rely on a single audience.

Meta Ads

Where the responses came from.

Daily volume and cost, then the campaign and creative behind it. Awareness spend is tracked separately and excluded from cost per response.

Responses & spend per day

Responses Daily spend
Window total 2,106 responsesShaded band = the current period, the bars before it are the previous one
CampaignSpendResponsesCost / responseConv. rateCTRCPC
AC 02 - Instant Form Leads - Car & Truck…
$2,99434$882.1%4.8%$1.69
AC 01 - Website Leads - August Creatives Best
$1,8962,072$0.9221.1%12.6%$0.19
Blended response total$4,8912,106$2.3218.4%--

Top-performing creative

Hook rate is the share of people shown the ad who stayed past 3 seconds. Hold rate is the share of those who kept watching to ThruPlay, 15 seconds or the end. 12 creatives carried spend this period and none of them were new.

Who the responses come from

Responses by age & gender

Where the responses concentrate. Response campaigns only.

MenWomen
18-245625-346835-4416245-5425455-6445065+1,113Unknown3

Responses by placement

Bar length is responses; the label shows cost per response. Response campaigns only.

Facebook Stories1,518 · $1.45 costInstagram Stories238 · $1.57 costFacebook feed108 · $4.58 costInstagram Reels96 · $3.96 costFacebook Reels87 · $2.78 costFacebook Reels overlay35 · $6.05 cost
i
Who the responses are coming from. Of the 2,094 responses with a demographic on file, 1,482 (71%) came from men and 1817 (86%) from the 45-and-over brackets. Measured on the response campaigns only; the individual age and gender cells are small, so read this as where demand concentrates, not a targeting verdict.
→
Placement is sorting the spend. Facebook Stories delivered the cheapest response at $1.45 (1,518 on $2,194). Measured on the response campaigns only.
What's next

Where we take it from here.

Each move ties back to what this window proved.

Primary move

Scale the winners, fix what is expensive.

We weight budget toward the lowest cost per lead and the winning creative while holding the expensive segments to prove their CPL can come down.

What we do
Step up the best audience and creative.
Evidence
$0.92 on the best segment.
Risk
CPL can drift as we scale; we cap increments.
We need
Your read on lead quality by segment.
Operating plan

The next window.

  • Build variations of the winning creative so results do not lean on one asset.
  • Refresh retargeting before frequency wears the warm audience out.
  • Cut or fix the segments running above target CPL.
  • Review lead quality together so we optimize toward closed deals, not just form fills.
The next chapter

Now we scale it.

We push the proven audiences and creative, fix what is expensive, and bring you a fresh read each window. Tell us how the leads land in your pipeline.

Talk through the plan