forEcoView Windows DFW
Meta Ads Report · Last 30 days

77 booked appointments at $360 each.

Over Aug 15 - Sep 13, 2026, Meta produced 77 booked sales appointments from 353 leads registered in the CRM, a 22% set rate, at $360 per appointment.

77
Booked appointments
up 15% vs prior 30 days
$360
Cost / appointment
up 20% vs prior 30 days
22%
Appointment set rate
CRM leads that booked
$27,696
Meta spend
up 38% vs prior 30 days
Appointments are sales presentations set in MarketSharp during this window. Cost per appointment is Meta lead-campaign spend divided by those appointments. Cost per lead is reported in the campaign table below, not as the headline.
The story

The window in three moves.

We lead with the result, then show how the campaigns and creative produced it.

01
$47

NZ 01 - DFW Form is the engine

Lowest cost per lead at $47. Same creative, best economics, so budget stays weighted here.

02
62

One creative carries

"06/22 - EV_Ad Creative_v3" drove 62 leads at about $53 each. The message that is landing.

03
5

Diversified sources

5 lead campaigns contributed, so results do not rely on a single audience.

Meta Ads

Where the leads came from.

Daily volume and cost, then the campaign and creative behind it. Awareness spend is tracked separately and excluded from cost per lead.

Leads & spend per day

Leads Daily spend
Window total 329 leadsShaded band = the current period, the bars before it are the previous one
CampaignSpendLeadsCost / leadApptsCost / apptCTRCPC
NZ 01 - Austin Best Performers Form
$11,797104$11312$9831.8%$3.59
NZ 01 - DFW Form
$5,451115$4714$3892.7%$1.34
NZ 01 - DFW Best Performers Form Best cost / appt
$5,41582$6629$1872.0%$3.25
NZ 01 - Waco/Temple Form
$4,47126$1724$1,1182.1%$2.62
NZ 01 - Austin Form
$5622$2810n/a1.7%$3.27
Blended lead total$27,696329$8459$469--
i
Why this column adds up to less than the headline. The 59 appointments here are the ones we can tie back to a specific campaign by matching the lead. The headline counts every appointment your CRM attributes to Meta, including people who came in through a channel we cannot trace to one campaign. Read this column for which campaign books best, and the headline for the total.

Top-performing creative

Ranked by booked appointments, not by cost per lead.

Hook rate is the share of people shown the ad who stayed past 3 seconds. Hold rate is the share of those who kept watching to ThruPlay, 15 seconds or the end. 52 creatives carried spend this period and 9 of them went live inside it.

Who the leads come from

Leads by age & gender

Where the leads concentrate. Lead campaigns only.

MenWomen
25-341835-445145-545855-649865+104

Leads by placement

Bar length is leads; the label shows cost per lead. Lead campaigns only.

Facebook Reels184 · $86 costFacebook feed50 · $73 costFacebook Stories39 · $105 costInstagram Reels29 · $52 costInstagram Stories11 · $49 costInstagram feed8 · $104 cost
Placement is sorting the spend. Instagram Reels delivered the cheapest lead at $52 (29 on $1,497). Measured on the lead campaigns only.
Google Ads

Conversions over the window.

Daily conversions against daily spend across the window.

Conversions & spend per day

Conversions Daily spend
Window total 40 conv.Shaded band = the current period, the bars before it are the previous oneLast 3 days still filling in
i
How to read this chart. The decline late in the window is deliberate. Performance Max was paused on August 3 and the Demand Gen test was pulled on August 17, so the last stretch of this window is Search only. That removed most of the click volume, and most of the low-intent form fills with it. The set-rate split further down shows what we bought with it: Search landing-page leads booked a sales appointment at 36 percent, Performance Max at 0 percent.
Campaign split

Where the budget worked.

Spend and conversions by campaign. Brand search is separated so the true acquisition cost stays visible.

$5,409
NZ - Search - Core - DFW
19 conv · $285 CPA
$3,188
NZ - Search - Austin
10 conv · $319 CPA
$871
NZ - Search - Brand - DFW
6 conv · $145 CPA
7
Active campaigns
Search + PMax
NZ - Search - Core - DFW 19 conv · $285 CPA
$5,409
NZ - Search - Austin 10 conv · $319 CPA
$3,188
NZ - Search - Brand - DFW 6 conv · $145 CPA
$871
NZ - Search - Waco/Temple 3 conv · $292 CPA
$865
NZ - Search - Window Types… 0 conv
$484
NZ - Search - Window Types… 0 conv
$403
NZ - Search - Window Types… 0 conv
$390
NZ - Search - Competitors… 2 conv · $184 CPA
$367
NZ - Search - Competitors… 0 conv
$112
CampaignStatusSpendConv.Cost / conv.CTR
NZ - Search - Core - DFWActive$5,40919$2853.1%
NZ - Search - AustinActive$3,18810$3192.2%
NZ - Search - Brand - DFWActive$8716$14520.2%
NZ - Search - Waco/TempleActive$8653$2923.8%
NZ - Search - Window Types - AustinActive$4840n/a2.9%
NZ - Search - Window Types - DFWActive$4030n/a5.0%
NZ - Search - Window Types - WacoActive$3900n/a4.7%
NZ - Search - Competitors - DFWPaused$3672$1841.9%
NZ - Search - Competitors - AustinPaused$1120n/a2.0%
Total$12,15840$304-
i
The campaigns at the bottom of this table are new tests, not underperformers. Window Types went live on August 13, and Competitors and Brand on August 17, so they carry days of data rather than a full window and none has had time to produce a conversion. Competitor bidding in particular is still the open question we raised together on the last call. It stays under review rather than being scaled.
Call tracking

What happened on the phone.

Every call these ads produced and what became of it, measured on the call itself rather than on the ad platform. Google can see that a call started; this is how it ended. These counts will not tie exactly to the conversion table above, and they are not meant to: Google dates a call to the day the ad was clicked and waits a day for the data, so the same calls land on slightly different days in the two views.

31
Calls from these ads
Tracked end to end
100%
Reached someone
31 of 31
23
Ran past a minute
57 minutes on the phone
What happened to the callCallsShare
Reached someone31100%

How long the answered calls ran

Under 30 seconds
1
30 to 60 seconds
7
1 to 3 minutes
19
Over 3 minutes
4

Calls by day of the week

Monday 5 of 5 reached someone
5
Tuesday 7 of 7 reached someone
7
Wednesday 1 of 1 reached someone
1
Thursday 7 of 7 reached someone
7
Friday 7 of 7 reached someone
7
Saturday 2 of 2 reached someone
2
Sunday 2 of 2 reached someone
2
i
30 of the 31 callers had never called you before. That is what these campaigns are for: the phone ringing with someone new on the other end.
The pipeline

From leads to booked appointments.

Platform leads are only the start. This is what happened next in the CRM (MarketSharp) over the same window: how many became a booked sales appointment, and how many have sold. Meta forms land fully tracked; Google runs mostly on phone calls, which are still being connected to the campaigns.

Meta · Facebook / Instagram forms
Leads in CRM
353

Registered inquiries

Meta lead forms that landed in MarketSharp.

Booked
77 22% set

Sales appointments set

22% of leads booked a sales presentation this window.

Closed
13

Sales won

Deals that closed in the window; more of the appointments are still working through.

Google · books by phone
Landing-page forms
13

Real web leads

Forms tagged as the Google landing-page source, after removing test/QA submissions.

Google Ads calls · CallRail
21 14 qualified

Phone demand

Google Ads drove 21 tracked phone calls this window, 14 of them 60 seconds or longer. Calls are matched to Google by click ID, so this includes calls placed from the landing pages, not just the ad call button. Answered calls only. These already feed Google Ads bidding.

ChannelLeads in CRMAppts setSoldSet rate
Meta · Facebook / Instagram353771322%
Google134031%
i
† How Google's appointments and sales are counted. 4 came through the landing-page form, which is tagged automatically. The other 0 were found by matching the phone number of every caller who arrived on a Google ad click against the CRM, because those bookings get filed by hand at intake under Referral, Google or Call In, never under the Google tag. No sale from that group has closed inside this window yet. Treat these as a floor, not a total: a caller who leaves no matching record in the CRM cannot be counted at all.
i
The scorecard is appointments, not cost per lead. Meta turned 353 CRM leads into 77 booked appointments (22% set) and 13 sales. Cost per Meta appointment ran about $360. Counts are activity inside the window; a lead, its appointment and its sale can fall in different months, so appointments are the cleanest read on this window. Source: MarketSharp, sales-presentation appointments only.
What's next

Where we take it from here.

Each move ties back to what this window proved.

Operating plan

The next window.

  • Blocked the junk at the source Games, Kids and Kids and Family app categories are excluded account wide, plus Roblox, Minecraft, and installer and job-seeker terms.
  • Feeding appointments back to Google so bidding optimizes toward booked sales presentations rather than form submissions.
  • Watching Search delivery Search has less available inventory than PMax in these markets, so we are tracking whether the new split fills.
  • Reporting on appointments cost per appointment and set rate are the scorecard, not cost per lead.
The next chapter

Now we scale it.

We push the proven audiences and creative, fix what is expensive, and bring you a fresh read each window. Tell us how the leads land in your pipeline.

Talk through the plan