forEcoView Windows DFW
Meta Ads Report · Last 30 days

48 booked appointments at $373 each.

Over Jul 11 - Aug 9, 2026, Meta produced 48 booked sales appointments from 180 leads registered in the CRM, a 27% set rate, at $373 per appointment.

48
Booked appointments
MarketSharp
$373
Cost / appointment
Meta spend / appointments
27%
Appointment set rate
CRM leads that booked
$17,885
Meta spend
Last 30 days
Appointments are sales presentations set in MarketSharp during this window. Cost per appointment is Meta lead-campaign spend divided by those appointments. Cost per lead is reported in the campaign table below, not as the headline.
The story

The window in three moves.

We lead with the result, then show how the campaigns and creative produced it.

01
$40

NZ 01 - DFW Form is the engine

Lowest cost per lead at $40. Same creative, best economics, so budget stays weighted here.

02
136

One creative carries

"06/22 - EV_Ad Creative_v3" drove 136 leads at about $58 each. The message that is landing.

03
5

Diversified sources

5 lead campaigns contributed, so results do not rely on a single audience.

Meta Ads

Where the leads came from.

Daily volume and cost, then the campaign and creative behind it. Awareness spend is tracked separately and excluded from cost per lead.

Leads & spend per day

Leads Daily spend
Window total 265 leadsShaded band = latest 7 days
CampaignSpendLeadsCost / leadCTRCPC
NZ 01 - Austin Best Performers Form
$5,27673$722.3%$2.87
NZ 01 - DFW Best Performers Form
$4,99795$532.4%$2.80
NZ 01 - Waco/Temple Form
$3,45121$1642.1%$2.09
NZ 01 - DFW Form Best CPL
$2,71367$402.7%$1.36
NZ 01 - Austin Form
$1,4489$1612.1%$2.42
Blended lead total$17,885265$67--

Top-performing creative

Who the leads come from

Leads by age & gender

Where the leads concentrate. Lead campaigns only.

MenWomen
25-341635-444345-544855-646865+90

Leads by placement

Bar length is leads; the label shows cost per lead. Lead campaigns only.

Facebook Reels142 · $68 CPLFacebook feed37 · $80 CPLFacebook Stories33 · $77 CPLInstagram Reels25 · $43 CPLInstagram feed14 · $41 CPLInstagram Stories6 · $48 CPL
Placement is sorting the spend. Instagram feed delivered the cheapest lead at $41 (14 on $568). Measured on the lead campaigns only.
Google Ads

Conversions over the window.

Daily conversions against daily spend across the window.

Conversions & spend per day

Conversions Daily spend
Window total 136 conv.Shaded band = latest 7 daysLast 3 days still filling in
i
How to read this chart. Google phone conversions were not being counted between June 28 and July 21 because of a tracking setting on our side, corrected on July 22. Conversions dated before July 22 above are therefore almost entirely form submissions, and the Google cost per conversion for this window reads higher than the real one.
Campaign split

Where the budget worked.

Spend and conversions by campaign. Brand search is separated so the true acquisition cost stays visible.

$8,537
NZ - Search - DFW
41 conv · $208 CPA
$6,283
NZ - PMax - Austin
34 conv · $185 CPA
$6,002
NZ - PMax - DFW
42 conv · $143 CPA
3
Active campaigns
Search + PMax
NZ - Search - DFW 41 conv · $208 CPA
$8,537
NZ - PMax - Austin 34 conv · $185 CPA
$6,283
NZ - PMax - DFW 42 conv · $143 CPA
$6,002
NZ - Search - Austin 8 conv · $539 CPA
$4,316
NZ - PMax - Waco/Temple 11 conv · $241 CPA
$2,650
NZ - Search - Waco/Temple 0 conv · $0 CPA
$465
CampaignStatusSpendConv.Cost / conv.CTR
NZ - Search - DFWActive$8,53741$2083.1%
NZ - PMax - AustinPaused$6,28334$1854.3%
NZ - PMax - DFWPaused$6,00242$1433.7%
NZ - Search - AustinActive$4,3168$5392.7%
NZ - PMax - Waco/TemplePaused$2,65011$2413.0%
NZ - Search - Waco/TempleActive$4650n/a4.1%
Total$28,253136$208-
The pipeline

From leads to booked appointments.

Platform leads are only the start. This is what happened next in the CRM (MarketSharp) over the same window: how many became a booked sales appointment, and how many have sold. Meta forms land fully tracked; Google runs mostly on phone calls, which are still being connected to the campaigns.

Meta · Facebook / Instagram forms
Leads in CRM
180

Registered inquiries

Meta lead forms that landed in MarketSharp.

Booked
48 27% set

Sales appointments set

27% of leads booked a sales presentation this window.

Closed
5

Sales won

Deals that closed in the window; more of the appointments are still working through.

Google · books by phone
Landing-page forms
90

Real web leads

Forms tagged as the Google landing-page source, after removing test/QA submissions.

Google Ads calls · CallRail
82 41 qualified

Phone demand

Google Ads drove 82 tracked phone calls this window, 41 of them 60 seconds or longer. Calls are matched to Google by click ID, so this includes calls placed from the landing pages, not just the ad call button. Answered calls only. These already feed Google Ads bidding.

ChannelLeads in CRMAppts setSoldSet rate
Meta · Facebook / Instagram18048527%
Google · landing-page forms9010*—*phone*
i
Why Google reads light in the CRM. Google is phone-led. Those calls are tracked in CallRail and already feed Google Ads bidding, but in the CRM they log under phone or other sources, not the landing-page tag, so they do not roll up as "Google" appointments. Read Meta's funnel as complete and Google's as still wiring up.
i
The scorecard is appointments, not cost per lead. Meta turned 180 CRM leads into 48 booked appointments (27% set) and 5 sales. Cost per Meta appointment ran about $373. Counts are activity inside the window; a lead, its appointment and its sale can fall in different months, so appointments are the cleanest read on this window. Source: MarketSharp, sales-presentation appointments only.
What's next

Where we take it from here.

Each move ties back to what this window proved.

Operating plan

The next window.

  • Blocked the junk at the source Games, Kids and Kids and Family app categories are excluded account wide, plus Roblox, Minecraft, and installer and job-seeker terms.
  • Feeding appointments back to Google so bidding optimizes toward booked sales presentations rather than form submissions.
  • Watching Search delivery Search has less available inventory than PMax in these markets, so we are tracking whether the new split fills.
  • Reporting on appointments cost per appointment and set rate are the scorecard, not cost per lead.
The next chapter

Now we scale it.

We push the proven audiences and creative, fix what is expensive, and bring you a fresh read each window. Tell us how the leads land in your pipeline.

Talk through the plan