forCypress Point
Meta Ads Report · October 2026

19 leads at $71 each.

Over October 2026, Meta delivered 19 leads at a blended $71.

19
Leads
no prior month baseline
$71
Cost per lead
no prior month baseline
$1,677
Meta spend
no prior month baseline
$71
Only campaign with leads
NZ 01 - Leads - North Texas
Leads are conversions recorded on the website by the Meta pixel. Blended cost per lead covers the lead campaigns; awareness spend is shown separately and excluded.
The story

The month in three moves.

We lead with the result, then show how the campaigns and creative produced it.

01
$71

NZ 01 - Leads - North Texas carried the whole window

It was the only campaign producing leads, so $71 per lead is the account's cost per lead, not the best of several.

02
9

One creative carries

"10/09 - Video - One Hour From…" drove 9 leads at about $89 each. The message that is landing.

03

Steady delivery

Campaigns delivered consistently across the window.

Meta Ads

Where the leads came from.

Daily volume and cost, then the campaign and creative behind it. Awareness spend is tracked separately and excluded from cost per lead.

Leads & spend per day

Leads Daily spend
Window total 19 leadsShaded band = the current period, the bars before it are the previous one

The latest week

Last 7 days vs the prior 7Oct 18 to Oct 24Oct 25 to Oct 31Change
Spend$575$575no change
Leads75small base
Cost / lead$82$115small base

The full window above stays the main read. This is the latest week on its own, so a turn shows before the average catches it. The newest days are still filling in: conversions are credited to the day of the click and some report a few days late, so this week usually rises a little.

CampaignSpendLeadsCost / leadConv. rateCTRCPC
NZ 01 - Leads - North Texas Best CPL
$1,35519$710.4%4.6%$0.21
NZ 01 - IG Profile Visits - North Texas Engagement$3220n/an/a4.0%$0.40
Blended lead total$1,35519$710.4%--

Top-performing creative

Hook rate is the share of people shown the ad who stayed past 3 seconds. Hold rate is the share of those who kept watching to ThruPlay, 15 seconds or the end. 10 creatives carried spend this period and 10 of them went live inside it.

Who the leads come from

Leads by age & gender

Where the leads concentrate. Lead campaigns only.

MenWomen
25-34235-44445-54655-64665+1

Leads by placement

Bar length is leads; the label shows cost per lead. Lead campaigns only.

Facebook Reels11 · $36 costInstagram Reels4 · $111 costFacebook feed3 · $93 costInstagram feed1 · $163 costFacebook Reels overlay0 · $57 spent
i
Who the leads are coming from. Of the 19 leads with a demographic on file, 13 (68%) came from men and 13 (68%) from the 45-and-over brackets. Measured on the lead campaigns only; the individual age and gender cells are small, so read this as where demand concentrates, not a targeting verdict.
→
Placement is sorting the spend. Facebook Reels delivered the cheapest lead at $36 (11 on $401). Measured on the lead campaigns only.
Google Ads

Conversions over the month.

Daily conversions against daily spend across the month.

Conversions & spend per day

Conversions Daily spend
Window total 15 conv.Shaded band = the current period, the bars before it are the previous oneLast 3 days still filling in

The latest week

Last 7 days vs the prior 7Oct 18 to Oct 24Oct 25 to Oct 31Change
Spend$234$217-7%
Conversions42small base
Cost / conversion$58$108small base

The full window above stays the main read. This is the latest week on its own, so a turn shows before the average catches it. The newest days are still filling in: conversions are credited to the day of the click and some report a few days late, so this week usually rises a little.

Campaign split

Where the budget worked.

Spend and conversions by campaign. Brand search is separated so the true acquisition cost stays visible.

$749
NZ:Search | Lake…
15 conv · $50 CPA
1
Active campaigns
Search
NZ:Search | Lake Homesites… 15 conv · $50 CPA
$749
CampaignStatusSpendConv.Cost / conv.CTR
NZ:Search | Lake Homesites | North Texas…Active$74915$5012.4%
Total$74915$50-
What's next

Where we take it from here.

Each move ties back to what this window proved.

Primary move

One campaign carried this. Widen it before scaling it.

Everything here came from a single campaign, so there is no second line to weight budget against yet. The next step is a second audience or creative to compare it with, and only then a budget increase.

What we do
Add a second line to compare against.
Evidence
$71 per lead on the only campaign producing leads.
Risk
Scaling a single campaign hides whether the cost holds or the audience is simply small.
We need
Your read on which audience to open next.
Operating plan

The next window.

  • Build variations of the winning creative so results do not lean on one asset.
  • Cut or fix the segments running above target CPL.
  • Review lead quality together so we optimize toward closed deals, not just form fills.
The next chapter

Now we widen it.

We push the proven audiences and creative, fix what is expensive, and bring you a fresh read each window. Tell us how the leads land in your pipeline.

Talk through the plan